My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Minutes 06/07/1977
City-of-Martinsville
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
1977
>
Minutes 06/07/1977
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/12/2006 11:44:41 AM
Creation date
12/12/2006 10:25:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Meeting Date
6/7/1977
City Council - Category
Minutes
City Council - Type
Special
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />198 <br /> <br />TUESDAY <br /> <br />JUNE 7. 1977 <br /> <br />In my oplnlon, good personnel management is absolutely necessary for <br />a service oriented organization that employs close to 300 people, because <br />a City Government is only as good and efficient as the quality of its <br />employees. <br /> <br />Mr. West states that he doesn't think we need a "focus on federal <br />grant programs", and he opposes the idea of a Grants Coordinator for the <br />City. He feels we have been perfectly capable of securing federal monies <br />in the past. I disagree. Martinsville has no one person whose responsibilities <br />include finding, studying, processing and following up federal and state <br />programs, and I feel that this may have caused potential loss of revenues. <br /> <br />Mr. West talks about "socio-economic programs" which could result in <br />"Martinsville becoming one of those cities headlined in the May 30 Richmond <br />Times Dispatch; Central Cities Decline Blamed on Series of Federal Policies". <br />Frankly, I have no idea what he is talking about, and I wish he would explain <br />what specific programs he is referring to, and how these specific programs <br />relate to the question of a Grants Coordinator for the City of Martinsville. <br /> <br />In my opinion, each Councilman has a responsibility to all the people <br />to explore every opportunity for additional revenues from state and federal <br />sources - any funds that will benefit the community, get back tax dollars to <br />the City, and prevent tax increases to the citizens. Each program should be <br />studied on its own merits. No program should ever be pursued where the guide- <br />lines, or "strings", are too restrictive to live with. <br /> <br />During the past two budget years. I think Council has observed these <br />principles. <br /> <br />Last year, Council voted to participate in the Housing Assistance <br />Payments Program for Existing Housing to help 138 low-income families, <br />including elderly couples, find shelter in existing inexpensive apartments. <br />The program requires no capital outlays, operates at no cost to the City, <br />and there is no way that the City can be locked-in to funding the program <br />with local funds. <br /> <br />This year, Council voted to accept around $50,000 Federal Funds to <br />rennovate a building to be used by the elderly and handicapped, and approximately <br />$l2,000 to be used for a recreation program for the elderly at a cost of less <br />than $300 yearly to the City. The City can terminate the program at the end of <br />any year, with no strings attached. <br /> <br />On the other hand, Council decided, this year, not to accept Federal Funds <br />for a new transit system because the program required a ten year, commitment by <br />the City to operate the transit system at a loss and if Council terminated the <br />transit system before ten years, the City would have to pay back over 1/4 million <br />dollars. Council decided that the strings of the Federal program were too <br />stringent for the community to live with. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.