Laserfiche WebLink
<br />4 <br /> <br />TUESDAY <br /> <br />MARCH 11, 1975 <br /> <br />Council acknowledged the following statement, prepared by Councilman Greene, <br /> <br />as well as a request by Councilman Fitz-Hugh of City Manager Noland for a <br /> <br />capital improvements program as well as operating needs of the City for the <br /> <br />next five years: <br /> <br />At the last Council meeting, I offered in discussion some figures <br />relating to past and current budgets. I would like to go on record <br />tonight with an explanation of the figures, and their relationship <br />to Council's decision as to whether or not to pursue funds under the <br />Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 or any other state and <br />federal programs. <br /> <br />On May 31, 1973, City Manager Tom Noland released his 1973-1974 <br />budget report. He ended his report with a section entitled "Down the <br />Road." In this section, Mr. Noland warned the City that "normal <br />revenue growth is not likely to provide for inflation and anticipated <br />additional needs." Mr. Noland cautioned against expecting windfall <br />dollars to meet upcoming needs. He stated, "Year before last, the <br />split tax billing windfall (billing property taxes twice a year <br />instead of once as we had traditionally done); now "Revenue-Sharing," <br />(Federal Revenue Sharing Funds which the city began receiving in <br />January, 1972), but while looking down the road into the future, <br />it would be less than wise to anticipate another windfall over the <br />next rise." <br /> <br />In my opinion, the City of Martinsville is now, in Mr. Noland's <br />words, "Down the Road." The city finances are now at the point <br />where Council must come to grips with budget problems that Council <br />began to face almost four years ago. <br /> <br />In Fiscal 1972 Council was short of funds so the real estate <br />billing procedure was changed from once a year to twice a year. <br />Director of Finance, Holladay Yeaman, states that the change <br />resulted in a net of $753,674 additional revenues to the General <br />Fund for that year only. The windfall monies enabled Council to <br />pay for capital improvements, including $326,948 for the Thoroughfare <br />Street Program and to end up the year with a balanced budget. <br /> <br />In Fiscal 1973 Council only needed to spend $31,898 for the <br />Thoroughfare Street Program, $295,050 less than the previous <br />year, and ended up with a balanced budget. <br />