Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Geneyal Study of Alt~rnativ_(;_~ <br /> <br />It can be fairly said that the Ridgeway Hydro Project originated with Electric <br />Department Bob Corekin who, in 1973, undertook a general view of alternatives <br />to supplement the City's power supply and to hedge against foreseeable esca- <br />lation of energy costs. Corekin's review considered and rejected, for various <br />technical reasons, the possibilities of the City generating a larger percent of <br />its own power by burning coal, or oil or gas. The more exotic generation <br />options of nuclear, solar and wind were also ruled out. <br /> <br />This left hydroelectric generation; and moves were then undertaken by the <br />City staff and later by City Council to formally pursue this alternative. The <br />current project is the result. <br /> <br />R.. W. Beck and Associates, the Engineering <br />Consultant, in Preliminary Efforts <br /> <br />This nationally-known consulting firm, with its principal office in Seattle, <br />first entered the picture in late 1976. On December 14th of that year, <br />City Council contracted with the Beck firm, for $17,250, to undertake a <br />statewide survey and analysis of all potential hydroelectric sites that could <br />serve the City's interests. In May, 1977, this report was submitted to the <br />City. It identified a site on the Smith River ~ just south of Martinsville, as <br />a good potential site for a llpeaking plant" (one located on a tributary stream <br />with larger heads and best used to produce power to meet peak load require- <br />ments of a utility), and it was dubbed the Ridgeway Site. A related recom- <br />mendation in this original report was that an llappraisal study" be promptly <br />initiated to more fully ascertain the potential of the Ridgeway Site. <br /> <br />The City entered a second contract with Beck in August~ 1977, agreeing to <br />spend $55,000 for an Appraisal Report on what was now becoming generally <br />known as the Ridgeway Hydro Project. This report was to include field <br />inspections of this proposed site, further hydrological studies, reservoir <br />studies, preliminary cost estimates, review of environmental concerns. and <br />other technical work, ending with preparation of an application to the Federal <br />Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) for a preliminary permit for the pro- <br />posed Ridgeway Project. This report was delivered to the City in June, 1978; <br />concluded that the Ridgeway Project was technically feasible; and preliminarily <br />described it as follows: <br /> <br />a. A dam, 12.5 river miles southeast of the City, that would <br />be 110-feet high and standing against an average river <br />flow of 598 cubic feet/second. <br /> <br />b. A resulting reservoir that would <br /> <br />have a drainage area of 529 square miles <br />have a normal surface 639 feet about sea level <br />be 14 miles long <br />have 100 miles of shoreline <br />be 1/2 mile at the widest point <br />be 84 feet deep at the dam <br />have a normal surface area of 2,400 acres <br />have a storage capacity of 81,000 acre-feet. <br /> <br />-2- <br />