Laserfiche WebLink
<br />1,;., .) <br />x \ ~ "--'J <br /> <br />NOVEMBER 23, 1982 <br /> <br />TUESDAY <br /> <br />eliminated the numerous phone calls for information from vendors which <br />previously existed. However, when a vendor had more than ten invoices <br />in the system, the computer program voided the check mechanically by <br />printing asterisks in the dollar position on the check, printed the <br />vendor's name and the phrase "continued on next check". The program then <br />caused the check to skip to the next stub portion and continued to print <br />invoice numbers and dollar amounts per invoice. As an example, if fifteen <br />(15) invoices were in the system, two checks printed--one valid and one <br />mechanically voided. Both checks were then processed through the check <br />bursting/signing machine and mailed to the vendor. Our mistake was not <br />to pull our the mechanically voided check prior to mailing. This is now <br />being done. <br /> <br />DORMANT BANK ACCOUNTS <br /> <br />The City currently maintains two checking accounts on which <br />no checks have been issued in excess of two years. Out- <br />standing checks on these accounts should be written off and <br />the balances in the accounts transferred to regular checking <br />accounts or interest bearing accounts. <br /> <br />One of these accounts is a holdover from the time when the City was <br />responsible for writing various welfare checks, and this account is at <br />Virginia National Bank. When the State began to make welfare payments <br />directly to recipients, the account lapsed into disuse. <br /> <br />The second account, with Piedmont Trust Bank, was set up as a special <br />checking account to fund the local tax rebate of 1979. Since that time, <br />the account has been left open to handle the few checks that periodically <br />cleared, even though these checks were clearly marked "to be cashed <br />within 90 days". <br /> <br />Although the Finance Department is held as a correspondent for the invest- <br />ment of idle funds, it has no direct control over bank accounts. We will <br />follow up immediately, however, on previous requests to the Treasurer to <br />close the two dormant accounts in question. <br /> <br />Summary <br /> <br />We generally concur with the recommendations in the auditor's report. <br />Many of these matters have been or are being presently resolved. Other <br />than where noted, we do not anticipate that those concerns within my <br />jurisdiction will persist by the end of the current fiscal year. <br /> <br />Response by City Treasurer Bouldin <br /> <br />I wish to make the following response to the items you requested, <br />as covered in the current audit report for the fiscal year ending <br />June 30, 1982: <br /> <br />With regard to the reconciliation of bank accounts, I have endeavored <br />