Laserfiche WebLink
<br />TUESDAY <br /> <br />APRIL 27, 1982 <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />A special and duly-called meeting (by Council action taken during its regular meeting <br /> <br />hald April 13, 1982) of the Council of the City of Martinsville, Virginia, was held <br /> <br />Tuesday, April 27, 1982, in the Council Chamber, City Hall, beginning at 3:00 P.M., <br /> <br />for the purpose of giving initial study and consideration to City Manager Edmonds' <br /> <br />recommended City Budget for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 1982. All members of <br /> <br />Council were present, as follows: Mayor Barry A. Greene, Presiding Officer; Vice <br /> <br />Mayor William C. Cole, Jr.; L. D. Oakes; Henry C. Reed; and Francis T. West. <br /> <br />Following the invocation and the stating of the aforesaid purpose of this meeting, <br /> <br />City Manager Edmonds offered some introductory comments about his recommended 1982- <br /> <br />83 City Budget and his accompanying Budget Message; and, subsequently, during ensuing <br /> <br />discussion of the proposed budget, Mr. Edmonds called Council's attention to adverse <br /> <br />financial conditions envisioned and developing in the City's water utility fund and <br /> <br />the need for an independent water rate study as a framework around which Council <br /> <br />might increase and restructure current water rates, not only to reverse this fund's <br /> <br />declining financial condition but also to develop with as much equity as possible a <br /> <br />rate structure to finance or help finance the cost of capital requirements (in an <br /> <br />amount yet unknown but for or on which more definite information is expected to be <br /> <br />available by July 1, 1982) for acquiring additional raw water. Furthermore, as Mr. <br /> <br />Edmonds pointed out in his Budget Message, the sewer utility fund is also faced with <br /> <br />great uncertainty as to capital requirements during the upcoming fiscal year. In <br /> <br />summary, the recommended budget was balanced without requiring any increase in <br /> <br />property tax rates or in general fund service charges; it proposed (for personnel <br /> <br />under the City Manager's jurisdiction) an 8% cost-of-living increase through adjust- <br /> <br />to the City's current pay plan; and it provided for a net increase of two minor <br /> <br />positions in the General Fund and one in the Water Fund (under the Manager's <br /> <br />jurisdiction) . <br />