My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Minutes 02/26/1982
City-of-Martinsville
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
1982
>
Minutes 02/26/1982
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/4/2006 2:13:02 PM
Creation date
12/4/2006 1:07:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Meeting Date
2/26/1982
City Council - Category
Minutes
City Council - Type
Special
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />.. r <br /> <br />FRIDAY <br /> <br />FEBRUARY 26, 1982 <br /> <br />In the public hearing portion of this meeting, and responding to a request from Mrs. <br /> <br />Dorothy Blitz, of 114 Emmett Street, Mr. John P. Doane, Treasurer of The Budd Company, <br /> <br />gave a brief description of the proposed project and the reasons the local Budd Company <br /> <br />plant has been selected for the project, much of this information having already been <br /> <br />presented by Mr. Doane at Council's February 23rd meeting. <br /> <br />Mrs. Blitz then presented the following prepared statement, with certain allegations <br /> <br />therein being refuted by Mr. Doane in responding thereto: <br /> <br />This area is in desperate need of jobs and an expanded industrial tax base, <br />but this grant proposal is a taxpayers giveaway to Budd. And there is no <br />insurance that the so-called trickle down effect won't dry up once the New <br />York contract is filled. <br /> <br />What I find most objectionable is that this 6% loan is welfare for the rich. <br />It is the taxpayer subsidizing the profits of the private sector. These <br />days there isn't a small businessman or homeowner who wouldn't give his eye- <br />tooth for a loan at 6%. <br /> <br />Beyond that, however, I have other hesitations about this loan. Just sup- <br />posing Budd does wrangle the New York contract. Do we have any commitment <br />from Budd that they won't close up shop in 4~ years, causing the same <br />economic and social dislocation that occurred when they locked the gates in <br />1980? No. And Budd showed their kind of commitment to those 500 workers <br />they laid off. They railroaded through a clause in the contract stating <br />that they are not obligated to rehire those employees, should they re-open <br />the Ridgeway operation. Let Budd show their commitment to our area by re- <br />hiring laid off workers based on seniority, and then make them agree to keep <br />those workers on payroll until the loan is paid in full. <br /> <br />Let Budd also show their commitment to this community by contracting out <br />to local contractors--and to insure equality, let Budd guarantee that <br />minority contractors receive a fair percentage of the work generated by <br />these Federal tax dollars, and according to existing Federal guidelines. <br /> <br />You say that you are committed to industrial development. Well, if you <br />are really committed to local industrial development, here is an excellent <br />opportunity to cash in and raise some money. I say make the corporations <br />pay. Give the loan, but make it available at the going interest rate. <br />Budd would still be getting a good deal, considering the low wages they pay <br />here in Henry County, compared to the wages they pay to their workers in <br />Philadelphia. <br /> <br />Let Budd prove its commitment to our area, without a "no strings attached" <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.