Laserfiche WebLink
<br />406 <br /> <br />TUESDAY <br /> <br />AUGUST 14, 1984 <br /> <br />thereafter and, too, would reduce the City's monetary involvement in a "third plant" <br /> <br />if constructed by the Henry County Public Service Authority. Other discussions cen- <br /> <br />tered upon the odor control improvements to be installed at the City's treatment <br /> <br />plant, i.e., as to whether Wiley & Wilson can guarantee that such improvements will <br /> <br />permanently eliminate offensive odors, with Mr. Tom Crush, of Wiley & Wilson, indi- <br /> <br />cating that--while no complete guarantee is possible with any such facility--the best <br /> <br />technology is being employed toward achieving this goal. After further discussion, <br /> <br />and upon motion, duly seconded and unanimously carried, Council directed City Manager <br /> <br />Edmonds, along with his staff and the City's consulting engineers, to conduct the <br /> <br />studies recommended by Mayor Cole and PSA Chairman Hubbard as well as to resume nego- <br /> <br />tiations with the PSA (on matters subject to negotiation) and to provide Council with <br /> <br />a status (or progress) report thereon within forty-five (45) days. <br /> <br />By the following written report dated August 8, 1984, City ~1anager Edmonds emphasized <br /> <br />the impendent need for Council to decide how to finance certain capital improvements <br /> <br />for the City's water and sewer utility systems, as described in this report, with Mr. <br /> <br />Edmonds recommending certain preliminary procedures, as part of the report, necessary <br /> <br />to a November 6th referendum on his proposed method of financing the cost of these <br /> <br />improvements: <br /> <br />Background <br /> <br />More than two years ago, it became apparent that we would have <br />to issue some bonds to finance needed capital improvements in <br />the Water Fund and in the Sewer Fund. <br /> <br />Two assumptions were made early on, as follows: <br /> <br />1. That the bonds to be issued would be "pure" re- <br />venue bonds--that is, backed strictly by reve- <br />nues derived from the utility systems involved; <br />and <br /> <br />2. That such bonds could and would be simply autho- <br />rized by an ordinance adopted by the Council-- <br />that is, without the necessity of a referendum <br />