Laserfiche WebLink
<br />316 <br /> <br />TUESDAY <br /> <br />APRIL 24, 1984 <br /> <br />findings (in the form of a written report) which concluded that, after taking into con- <br /> <br />sideration the estimated cost of dredging versus electric energy and/or the cost of <br /> <br />purchased power, dredging would not be financially feasible nor would it result in more <br /> <br />usable water for electric generation. Mr. Dodl and Wiley & Wilson, however, did recom- <br /> <br />mend a very limited amount of dredging near the City's impoundment dam (estimated to <br /> <br />cost $23,800.00) to avoid operational problems which might effect the dam's floodgates <br /> <br />and the plant's generators and, also, the removal of large rocks from the tail-race <br /> <br />below the generators (at an estimated cost of $5,000.00-to-$6,000.00). The engineers <br /> <br />suggested, further, that some consideration might be given to increasing the height of <br /> <br />the dam's floodgates by some three inches which, if done, would not adversely affect <br /> <br />up-stream properties and industries. Meanwhile, City Manager Edmonds urged Council to <br /> <br />consider appropriating funds in the forthcoming 1984-85 budget necessary to finance the <br /> <br />cost of the limited dredging and the rock removal, as recommended. <br /> <br />Mayor Cole noted receipt of a recent letter from Appalachian Power Company generally <br /> <br />pointing to upcoming negotiations between Appalachian and the City of Martinsville with <br /> <br />regard to the City's "purchased power" contract with Appalachian (i.e., rates at which <br /> <br />the City purchases "wholesale" electric energy from Appalachian for retail resale). <br /> <br />Council acknowledged receipt of a financial report for the third quarter of fiscal <br /> <br />1984-85, as prepared by Finance Director Richard D. Fitts and, in so doing suggested that <br /> <br />the City's representatives to the Virginia General Assembly be made aware of problems <br /> <br />encountered by the City in being adequately and timely reimbursed for the State's share <br /> <br />of local jail-prison farm expenses. <br /> <br />Upon motion, duly seconded and unanimously carried, and pursuant toSection 2.1-344(a)(2) <br />