My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Minutes 01/24/1984
City-of-Martinsville
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
1984
>
Minutes 01/24/1984
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/16/2006 2:35:45 PM
Creation date
11/16/2006 10:12:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Meeting Date
1/24/1984
City Council - Category
Minutes
City Council - Type
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />~56 <br /> <br />TUESDAY <br /> <br />JANUARY 24, 1984 <br /> <br />Water and Wastewater Disposal Plan" (M/R Plan), dating <br />from September, 1973, clearly anticipates the expansion <br />of the City's plant to serve the City and the southern <br />part of Henry County, as required. More exactly, it <br />proposes a 10.0 MGD capacity for the City's plant by <br />1990. <br /> <br />2. The M/R Plan does not contemplate the diversion of <br />sewage from the City to the Koehler Plant. <br /> <br />3. The M/R Plan has no reference to a "third plant" on <br />Marrowbone Creek or anywhere else in southern Henry <br />County. (And neither did Overman's January, 1982 <br />report.) <br /> <br />However, what is more important, the City generally embraced the two-plant <br />"regional" concept of Overman's report and lengthy negotiations followed <br />between the City staff/engineers and the P.S.A. staff/engineers. The <br />discussions finally revolved around the question of which of the two plants <br />should be expanded first--since there was no short or mid-term need seen to <br />expand both plants simultaneously. <br /> <br />The which-first question was difficult to resolve because it appeared to <br />the City, based on projected costs of diversion and buy-in and expansion <br />of the Koehler plant, that such a move would be more expensive than <br />expansion of the City's plant. Conversely, P.S.A. saw expansion of the <br />City's plant to be more expensive for them, as a first step toward <br />implementing the two-plant concept. <br /> <br />We forced this issue on November 15, 1983, because it was apparent to me <br />that the matter was stalemated and the capacity problem at our plant <br />was ever-mounting. On that date, as you will recall, Wiley & Wilson <br />briefed the Council fully and recommended specifically that the City <br />proceed at our plant with (a) existing plant improvements and additional <br />odor control measures, and (b) expansion from 6.0 MGD to 8.0 MGD. This <br />recommendation was based on a couple of vital assumptions--that P.S.A. <br />would honor the current sewer agreement and pay its share of the digester <br />and odor control improvements (just as they did the "interim" improvements) <br />and that P.S.A. would sooner or later find it necessary to buy and <br />guarantee availability of its 1/3 portion of the expanded capacity. <br /> <br />The Council took the matter under advisement, but at this point and for <br />the first time the Henry County Board of Supervisors interceded. This <br />took the form of a proposed meeting, held on December 19, 1983, between <br />the Council, the Board of P.S.A. and the Board of Supervisors. The <br />meeting was ostensibly to discuss "an old plan involving the building <br />of a third sewage treatment plant south of the City somewhere in the <br />vicinity of Leatherwood Creek". The letter of invitation went ahead to <br />say, "The possible construction of a third plant is a relatively new <br />concept and is definitely long range in nature. It should not be <br />construed as interfering or supplementing the current discussions and <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.