My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Minutes 06/11/1985
City-of-Martinsville
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
1985
>
Minutes 06/11/1985
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/3/2006 3:33:54 PM
Creation date
11/3/2006 2:50:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Meeting Date
6/11/1985
City Council - Category
Minutes
City Council - Type
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />109 <br /> <br />TUESDAY, JUNE 11, 1985 <br /> <br />1. Decrease of property values thus making it difficult for <br />them to sell their property at a fair price. <br />2. Increase of traffic thus presenting a hazard to the safety <br />of pedestrians and vehicular traffic. <br />3. Change the character of the neighborhood from the present <br />quiet, family-oriented atmosphere where the residents feel <br />safe and secure to one where there will be lots of temporary <br />people they will not know anything about. <br /> <br />Mr. Benjamin R. Gardner, Attorney for Mr. Adams, stated that Mr. Adams was <br /> <br />concerned with the feelings and objections <br /> <br />of the people in the <br /> <br />neighborhood and had demonstrated this by reducing <br /> <br />the number of <br /> <br />apartments from his original request of 76 units to 63 units. Under the <br /> <br />present Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance a maximum of 113 units could be <br /> <br />put on this six-acre tract, or it could be subdivided to allow for 60 <br /> <br />units of duplexes. Mr. Adams has a "good neighbor" project with areas for <br /> <br />parking, recreation and other uses. The increased traffic volume would <br /> <br />still be within the limits of these streets. Everything has been done to <br /> <br />meet all the guidelines of the City for this development. <br /> <br />Mayor Cole noted that the responsibility of the Council is to see that the <br /> <br />conditions of the ordinances are met in granting or denying such <br /> <br />requests. <br /> <br />Councilman Oakes agreed but added that Council also had an <br /> <br />obligation to listen to the people as well as consider the legalities of <br /> <br />such a request. Oakes stated that he had lived in this neighborhood for <br /> <br />22 years and the apartments would be in his backyard, that he is proud of <br /> <br />the people and the community. His responsibility is to look at the total <br /> <br />needs of the City--knowing there is a need for housing--but looking at <br /> <br />every project on its own merits. <br /> <br />There are 35 families now in the <br /> <br />neighborhood and this project would bring in 63 more, thus increasing the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.