Laserfiche WebLink
October 26, 200 ~ <br /> <br />Medicaid <br />continued... <br /> <br />provider rates, enrollment and long-term <br />care round out the list of reasons for <br />Medicaid expenditure growth in the past <br />year. While there was talk at the federal <br />level of moving some of the prescription <br /> <br />drug responsibility to Medicare, which does <br />not pay the prescription drug costs for its <br />beneficiaries, Rowland said that discussion <br />fell silent after Sept. I 1..:- <br /> <br />Work group <br />weighs making <br />manufactured <br />homes a 'by-right <br />use' in single- <br />family districts <br /> <br /> AVirginia Housing Study Commission <br /> work group was scheduled to <br /> conSider a proposal to require <br /> localities to treat manufactured houses as <br /> single-family dwellings and to make them <br /> "by-right" in all single-family districts as <br /> this issue of Update went to press (Oct. 25). <br /> The Manufactured and Modular Housing <br /> Association, which put forth the proposal, <br /> contends that the proposal will promote <br /> affordable housing. The study was <br /> established by SJ437, which directed <br /> VHSC to study manufactured homes as a <br /> way to promote affordable housing. <br /> The text of the proposal is as follows: <br /> 15.2-2290.1 Certain manufactured <br /> homes deemed same as site-built homes <br /> "Localities adoptYng and enforcing zoning <br /> ordinances under the l~vvisions of this am'de <br /> shall provide that any ~ multi-sectioned <br />manufactured <br />home on an <br />individual lot <br />and on a <br />permanent <br />foundation <br />with masonry <br />skirting shall <br />be defined in all wning ordinances as a single <br />family dwelling, and shall be permitted in any <br />zoning distn'ct that permits singte family <br />dwellings constructed to the fJniforrn State*vide <br />BuiMing Code, subject to development standards <br />that are equivalent to those cq~licable to a site- <br />built single-family dwelling with the same or <br />equivalent zoning distn'cts. ' <br /> Manufactured housing is defined as <br />structures built under the 1976 Department <br />of Housing and Urban Development <br />Manufactured Housing Code, which <br />preempts local code standards, and is <br />commonly referred to as "HUD Code <br />Housing." These units have white HUD <br />stickers, showing conStruction in compli- <br />ance with the HUD rules. The <br />sticker preempts local building code <br />compliance for the structures. Modular <br />houses are those structures that are <br />assembled on the site and ar~ubject to <br />local building codes. <br /> <br /> The league is concerned about the <br /> proposal for a number of reasons. <br /> Localities should retain the authority to <br /> decide how to accommodate and promote <br /> affordable housing. This is a land-use issue. <br /> The proposal would be a mandate from the <br /> state that takes away another piece of local <br /> government authority. Requiring manufac- <br /> tured houses in all single-family districts is <br /> not a useful way to promote affordable <br /> homing. The proposal appears to further <br /> the interests of the manufactured housing <br /> industry more than it promotes more <br /> affordable housing. <br /> The proposal appears to exclude the <br /> traditional house trailer by using the term <br /> "multi-sectioned manufactured home." The <br /> term, however, is not defined, and therefore <br /> would include the traditional double-wide, <br /> in addition to structures that look like stick- <br /> built houses. This raises the issue of <br /> whether such housing actually furthers <br /> affordable housing, because, unlike stick- <br /> built housing, some types of manufactured <br /> homes decline in value over time. <br /> The proposal does make manufactured <br />houses subject to the same zoning limita- <br />tions to which all other single-family homes <br />are subject, such as minimum/maximum <br />floor area ratios, setbacks, minimum square <br />footage and similar rules. Housing in an <br />historic district would also presumably be <br />subject to the historic district rules. Some <br />protection is provided by these factors. <br />However, in a number of localities, manu- <br />factured houses are not allowed in the more <br />expenSive single-family areas today. With- <br />out enacting new safeguards, such as FAiRs, <br />that authority would cease if the law passes. <br /> The current § 15.2-2290 requires <br />localities to allow manufactured homes in <br />agricultural zoning districts where agricul- <br />tm'al activity is the dominant use. There- <br />fore, the subject has already been broached, <br />in that limited context, in the state code. <br />The proposal would be a major expansion <br />of the existing law. <br /> <br /> <br />