Laserfiche WebLink
these inherent problems, companies dealing with recyclables are likely to view the City's <br />materials as an inconvenience to handle rather than a supply of good materials that can be readily <br />marketed. Consequently, the City will pay a premium price for the collection, transportation, <br />and processing of any collected materials. <br /> <br />After reviewing the information and costs, it is recommended that the City proceed with <br />Speedweigh Recycling for the collection of cans (aluminum and bi-metal), newspaper, glass, and <br />plastics. Additional discussions will be held with Speedweigh regarding magazines. <br /> <br />For this service, estimated monthly costs are as follows: <br /> <br />Container rental: 4 containers x $80 per container per month = $320 <br />Haul fee: 1 @ $80 (cans) + 4 @ $125 (glass, plastic, newspaper) = $580 <br />(based on one empty per month for cans, glass, and newspaper, and two empties per month for <br />plastics) <br />Process Fee: plastic 0.90 tons/month x $60/ton + glass 3.0 tons/month x $25/ton = $129 <br /> <br />Total estimated cost: <br /> <br />$1,029/month <br /> <br />Information regarding material weight and number of empties per month is based on an average <br />of the data from the last year of operation of the drop off containers at the Harris Teeter site. It <br />should be noted that costs could be higher (or lower), depending on usage of the containers <br />and/or the addition of a container for magazines. <br /> <br />Future Considerations/Regulatory Issues <br /> <br />In the future, as the landfill closes and the City is faced with a disposal cost in the $40 per ton <br />range through the operation of a transfer station, the economics of a curb side program or <br />manned drop off site may be such that through avoided costs, it becomes cost effective to collect <br />all materials. The design of the transfer station will allow for the "picking" of certain materials <br />such as cardboard, pallets, even newspaper/cans/plastics if market conditions are favorable. The <br />entire issue of baling, storing, and shipping of materials will need to be considered as plans are <br />developed for the City's facility. Other options regarding markets, vendors, and materials related <br />to our current recycling efforts will continue to be explored as they become available and <br />adjustments will/can be made to the program as necessary <br /> <br />In addition, it should be noted that current regulations specified in the Virginia Waste <br />Management Act, Chapter 14, Title 10. 1 , Section 10. 1 - 1411 of the Code of Virginia, mandates a <br />statutory recycling rate of 25% and a report for calendar year 2000 is due in mid-April. The last <br />such report completed a number of years ago determined the City's rate to be in excess of 25%, <br />however, the majority of the City's recycling effort at that time was attributed to industrial <br />recycling, particularly Sara Lee and Tultex, neither of which are still in operation. I suspect that <br />as the year 2000 report data is compiled, the City's rate will be substantially below the required <br />25%. <br /> <br />LET <br /> <br /> <br />